Preview

Sports medicine: research and practice

Advanced search

Curvature of curve as an indicator of the optimal movement trajectory in physical rehabilitation. Elliptical rehabilitation movements

https://doi.org/10.17238/ISSN2223-2524.2020.2.5

Abstract

The movement dynamic characteristics are the main parameters for physical exercise dosing during the athlete recovery process. However, taking into account the geometric characteristics of movement is no less important, especially when restoring the joint range of motion. The hypothesis of the study was the assumption that the use of movements’ geometric characteristics allows to “design” the optimal physiological rehabilitation patterns for movement volume restoration. Objective: to develop general principles and to create a mathematical model of the optimal trajectory characteristics for the restored part of the athlete’s musculoskeletal system. Materials and methods: We used 3D Qualisys Motion Capture and Analysis System in our investigation. The study involved 32 complex coordination sports athletes (age 9-15) with hip and ankle joint injuries (bruises, sprains strains). All they required a joint movement volume restoration. Results: The study revealed that joint movement volume restoration following the individually selected pathways involving effective mathematical modeling (study group) takes shorter time to restore the athletes than traditional physiotherapy methods (control group). For typical injuries (bruises, sprains and strains) of the hip joint area, the rehabilitation took 18±5 days for controls and 12±3 days for experimental group subjects. Nearly the same pattern was observed in restoration the ankle joint (12±4 days of recovery for controls versus 8±3 days for the experimental group). Conclusions: Restoring the joint movement volume, the workloads should be evaluated with geometric rather than dynamic indicators; for planar movement, that should be the distal limb path curvature relative to the restored joint.

About the Authors

O. S. Vasilyev
Research Institute of Sports of the Russian State University of Physical Education, Sport, Youth and Tourism (SCOPLIPE)
Russian Federation

Oleg S.Vasilyev, M.D., Ph.D. (Philosophy), Sports Medicine Physician, Traumatologist-Orthopedist 

Moscow



S. P. Levushkin
Research Institute of Sports of the Russian State University of Physical Education, Sport, Youth and Tourism (SCOPLIPE); Institute of Developmental Physiology, Russian Academy of Education
Russian Federation

Sergey P. Levushkin, Director of the Scientific Research Institute of Sports and Sports Medicine, Grand PhD in Biological sciences

+7(916)965-00-94

Moscow



References

1. Park I, Buchanan J. Motor skill learning and the development of visual perception processes supporting action identifi cation. Journal of motor behavior. 2017;50(5):1-13.

2. Venture G, Laumond JP, Watier B. Biomechanics of anthropomorphic systems. Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics. Cham, Springer, 2019. 310 p.

3. Bernshteyn NA. O postroyenii dvizheniya. M.: Gosudarstvennoye izdatel’stvo meditsinskoy literatury, 1947. 254 p.

4. Goswami A, Vadakkepat P. Humanoid Robotics: A Reference. Netherlands, Springer Netherlands, 2019. 2699 p.

5. Stief F, Böhm H, Michel K, Schwirtz A, Döderlein L. Reliability and accuracy in three-dimensional gait analysis: a comparison of two lower body protocols. Journal of applied biomechanics. 2013;29(1):105-111.

6. Phinyomark A, Petri G, Ibáñez-Marcelo E, Osis ST, Ferber R. Analysis of Big Data in Gait Biomechanics: Current Trends and Future Directions. Journal of medical and biological engineering. 2018;38(2):244-260.

7. Jack WR. Th e analysis of voluntary muscular movements by certain new instruments. Journal of Anatomy and Physiology. 1895;29:473-478.

8. Derwort A. Untersuchungen über den zeitablauf fi gurierter bewegungen beim menschen. Pfl üger‘s Archiv für die gesamte Physiologie des Menschen und der Tiere. 1938;240(6):661-675.

9. Binet A, Courtier J. Sur la vitesse des mouvements graphiques. Revue Philosophique de la France et de l’Etranger. 1893;35:664-671.

10. Viviani P, Terzuolo C. Trajectory determines movement dynamics. Neuroscience. 1982;7(2):431-437.

11. Lacquaniti F, Terzuolo C, Viviani P. Th e law relating the kinematic and fi gural aspects of drawing movements. Acta psychologica. 1983;54(1-3):115-130.

12. Viviani P, Schneider R. A developmental study of the relationship between geometry and kinematics in drawing movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 1991;17(1):198-218.

13. Catavitello G, Ivanenko YP, Lacquaniti F, Viviani P. Drawing ellipses in water: evidence for dynamic constraints in the relation between velocity and path curvature. Experimental brain research. 2016;234(6):1649-1657.

14. Wann J, Nimmo-Smith I, Wing AM. Relation between velocity and curvature in movement: equivalence and divergence between a power law and a minimum-jerk model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human perception and performance. 1988;14(4):622-637.


Review

For citations:


Vasilyev O.S., Levushkin S.P. Curvature of curve as an indicator of the optimal movement trajectory in physical rehabilitation. Elliptical rehabilitation movements. Sports medicine: research and practice. 2020;10(2):5-13. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17238/ISSN2223-2524.2020.2.5

Views: 723


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2223-2524 (Print)
ISSN 2587-9014 (Online)