Comparative analysis of long-term results of treatment of patients with osteochondral knee injuries (prospective, randomized study)
https://doi.org/10.17238/ISSN2223-2524.2019.2.79
Abstract
Objective: to evaluate the long-term results of treatment of athletes with osteo-chondral knee defects. Damage of the hyaline cartilage of the knee joint is quite common, and in 5-10% of cases requires surgical treatment. In the absence of proper treatment, such damage can lead to the osteoarthritis. According to some data in the structure of knee injuries of athletes contains about 36% cases of full-layer damage of hyaline cartilage. The most popular methods of treatment are microfracture and mosaic autochondroplasty. Materials and methods: the study was carried out from 2015 to 2018. We examined 56 patients with full-layer damage of hyaline cartilage of the knee joint, among them: 32-soccer players, 12-volleyball players, 7-kickboxers/ wrestlers, 5-field athletes. All patients were divided into 2 representative groups. The first group included 42 patients who underwent microfracturing, in the second group involved 14 patients with mosaic autochondroplasty. KOOS and Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale used to evaluate the results. The results statistically processed using the Mann-Whitney U-test. The level of evidence defined as p≤0.05. Results: the average follow-up period was 2.3 years (from 1.5 to 2.8 years). Comparing the results obtained in both groups, we registered a prevailing of mosaic autochondroplasty per 1.5 points by the Lysholm Knee scale (95% confidence interval) and 2.7 points by the Knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome scale (95% confidence interval). Conclusions: long-term results of treatment of patients with osteo-chondral injuries of the knee joint showed no significant difference between microfracturing and mosaic autochondroplasty. In both groups, a high level of functional state of knee joint was obtained on the scales of Knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome and Lysholm Knee in comparison with preoperative evaluation. We believe that microfracturing is less aggressive and quite effective method of treatment of patients with osteo-chondral defects of large joints, especially at young age. However, it should be noted that the implementation of the mosaic autochondroplasty allows to get the best long-term results at the expense of a stable and full replacement of the defect.
About the Author
G. A. AirapetovRussian Federation
Georgiy A. Airapetov, M.D., Ph.D. (Medicine), Associate Professor of the Department of Traumatology and Orthopedics
Stavropol
References
1. Bojokin MS, Bojcova SA, Netilko GI. Possibilities of modern cellular technologies for restoration of damaged articular cartilage (analytical review of literature). Traumatology and orthopedics of Russia. 2016;22(3):122-31. Russian.
2. Barber FA, Chow JC. Arthroscopic osteochondral transplantation: histologic results. Arthroscopy. 2001;17(8):832-5.
3. Flanigan DC, Harris JD, Trinh TQ. Prevalence of chondral defects in athletes’ knees: a systematic review. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2010;(42):1795-801. DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181d9eea0.
4. Gilev IH, Milucov AU, Ustiancev DD. Application of osteochondral mosaic plasty in patients with deforming osteoarthritis of the knee joint. Politrauma. 2018;(1):32-8. Russian.
5. Løken S, Heir S, Holme I, Engebretsen L. 6-Year follow-up of 84 patients with cartilage defects in the knee. Knee scores improved but recovery was incomplete. ActaOrthop. 2010;81(5):611-8.
6. Heir S, Nerhus TK, Røtterud JH, Løken S, Ekeland A. Focal cartilage defects in the knee impairquality of life as much as severe osteoarthritis: a comparison of Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score in 4 patient categories scheduled for knee surgery. Am J Sports Med. 2010;38(2):231-7.
7. Benthien JP, Behrens P. The treatment of chondral and osteochondral defects of the knee with autologous matrixinduced chondrogenesis (AMIC): method description and recent developments. Knee Surg Sports TraumatolArthrosc. 2011;19(8):1316-9.
8. Robert H, Brophy, Scott A, Rodeo, Ronnie P. Knee Articular Cartilage Injuries in the National Football League – Epidemiology and Treatment Approach by Team Physicians. J Knee Surg. 2009;22(4):331-8.
9. Gobbi A, Karnatzikos G, Kumar A. Long-term results after microfracture treatment for full-thickness knee chondral lesions in athletes. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014;(22):1986-96.
10. Zar VV, Stepanov EB. Autoplastic substitution of the defects of the knee cartilage. Modern problems of science and education. 2016;(6):217. Russian.
11. Kin E. Articular cartilage treatment in high-level male soccer players: a prospective comparative study of arthroscopic second-generation autologous chondrocyte implantation versus microfracture. Am J Sports Med. 2011;(39):549-57. DOI: 10.1177/0363546511420688.
12. Mithoefer K, Williams RJ, Warren RF, Potter HG, Spock CR. The microfracture technique for the treatment of articular cartilage lesions in the knee. A prospective cohort study. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 2005;87(9):1911-20.
13. Gowd AK. Management of Chondral lesions of the knee: analysis of trends and short-term complications using the national surgical quality improvement program database. Arthroscopy. 2019;35(1):138-46.
14. Medvedeva EV, Grebenik EA, Gornostaeva SN. Repair of damaged articular cartilage: current approaches and future directions. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018:19(8):2366. Russian.
15. Airapetov GA, Vorotnikov AA, Konovalov EA. Creating a model of hyaline cartilage of the knee joint in patients with normal varus and valgus. Kazan medical journal. 2018;99(1):157-161. DOI: 10.17816/KMJ2018-157. Russian.
16. Westermann RW. Return to sport after operative management of osteochondritis dissecans of the capitellum: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Orthop. J. Sports Med. 2016;4(6):23-5.
17. Airapetov GA, Vorotnikov AA, Konovalov EA, Chukov SZ. Creating a map of the thickness of the hyaline cartilage of the human knee joint. Ulyanovsk medical and biological journal. 2018;(2):80-5. DOI: 10.23648/UMBJ.2018.30.14049. Russian.
18. Hangody L, Fules P. Autologous osteochondralmosaicplasty for the treatment of full-thickness defects of weightbearing joints: ten years of experimental and clinical experience. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 2003;85-A(2):25-32.
19. Krych AJ. Return to sport after the surgical management of articular cartilage lesions in the knee: a meta-analysis. Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017;25(10):3186-96.
Review
For citations:
Airapetov G.A. Comparative analysis of long-term results of treatment of patients with osteochondral knee injuries (prospective, randomized study). Sports medicine: research and practice. 2019;9(2):79-84. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17238/ISSN2223-2524.2019.2.79