Preview

Sports medicine: research and practice

Advanced search

NUGA-BEST in the complex of rehabilitation program in patients with ankylosing spondylitis

https://doi.org/10.17238/ISSN2223-2524.2020.1.13

Abstract

Study objective: to evaluate the eff ectiveness of Nuga-Best rehabilitation equipment in a comprehensive rehabilitation program for the patients with a central form of ankylosing spondylitis. Material and methods: the study involved 65 (aged 28 – 48, mean age 34,6±2,9) patients with a verifi ed diagnosis of ankylosing spondylitis. The patients were divided into two groups: the control group (n=32), receiving conventional treatment and the main group (n=33), which received procedures on Nuga-Best rehabilitation equipment along with traditional methods. The rehabilitation effectiveness criteria were: visual analogue scale of pain assessment, index BASDAI (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index), chest excursion, Schober test, Index BASMI (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index), indicators of psychoemotional status according to the Feling-Activity-Mood test. Results: At the end of the rehabilitation course, the range of movements in the aff ected parts of the spine increased from 2.98±0.23 cm to 5.56±0.27 cm (p<0.05) in the main group, and from 3.12±0.16 cm up to 5.11±0.14 cm in the control group (p<0.05). A decrease of the pain during walking was reported by 98.2% of the patients of the main and 67.3% of the control group (p<0.05). The volume of excursions of the spine was restored in 67% of patients of the first group, in 42% of the second group. The average BASDAI index reflecting the disease activity before treatment in the control group was 3.45±0.89 points, and after treatment decreased to 2.09±0.63 points (p<0,05). The rehabilitation procedures on Nuga-Best led to a signifi cantly more pronounced decrease in this index – from 3.35±0.91 to 1.82±0.61 points (p<0,05). The BASMI spinal mobility index in the control group before treatment was 4.03±1.12 points, after treatment 3.93±0.82 points, and in the main group of patients after treatment it was 3.11±0.91 points compared to pretreatment values of 4.12±1.26 points. Conclusions: In patients with central AS, Nuga-Best produces a multifactor effect, leading to a decrease in spine functional overload, promotes muscle relaxation and analgesia, increased range of motion in the spine and chest excursion, prolongs clinical remission and improves the psycho-emotional status of patients.

About the Authors

O. N. Vysogortseva
Tashkent Medical Academy
Uzbekistan

Olga N. Vysogortseva, MD, Ph.D. (Medicine), Associate Professor of the Department of Rehabilitation, Traditional Medicine and Physical Culture

Tashkent



A. A. Usmankhodzhaeva
Tashkent Medical Academy
Uzbekistan

Adibakhon A. Usmankhodzhaeva, MD, Ph.D. (Medicine), Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Rehabilitation, Traditional Medicine and Physical Culture

Tashkent



Z. F. Mavlyanova
Samarkand State Medical Institute
Uzbekistan

Zilola F. Mavlyanova, MD, Ph.D. (Medicine), Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Medical Rehabilitation and Sport Medicine

Samarkand

+998 (915) 22-93-91



References

1. Erdes ShF, Badokin VV, Bochkova AG, Bugrova OV, Gaidukova IZ et al. On the terminology of spondyloarthritis. Rheumatology Science and Practice. 2015;53(6):657-660. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.14412/1995-4484-2015-657-660.

2. Sieper J, Braun J. Clinicians Manual on Axial Spondiloarthritis. Springer Healthcare. 2014:9.

3. Erdes ShF. Th e basic principles of treatment of ankylosing spondylitis (Bechterew’s disease). Rheumatology Science and Practice. 2013;51(6):686-95. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.14412/1995-4484-2013-686-95.

4. Bodur H, Ataman S, Rezvani A. Quality of life and related variables in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Quality Life Res. 2011;20(4):543-549.

5. Smolen JS, Braun J, Dougados M, Emery P, Fitzgerald O et al. Treating spondyloarthritis, including ankylosing spondylitis and psoriatic arthritis, to target: recommendation of an international task force. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014;73(1):6-16.

6. Bochkova AG. Rekomendatsii po vedeniyu bol’nykh ankiloziruyushchim spondilitom. Po materialam Mezhdunarodnoy rabochey gruppy po izucheniyu ankiloziruyushchego spondilita (ASAS - Assesment Ankylosing Spondylitis Work Group). Modern Rheumatology Journal. 2009;3(4):5-10. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.14412/1996-7012-2009-566.

7. Kulikov AG, Tabiev VI. Ankylosing spondylitis: the new approaches to the restorative treatment. Russian Journal of Physiotherapy, Balneology and Rehabilitation. 2016;15(2):91-96. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.18821/1681-3456-2016-15-2-91-96.

8. Braun J, van den Berg R, Baraliakos X. 2010 update of the ASAS/EULAR recommendations for the management of ankylosing spondylitis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011;70:896-904.

9. Ponomarenko GN. Physical and rehabilitation medicine. National Guide. Moscow: GEOTAR-media. 2017. 512p. (In Russ.)

10. Sharan D, Rajkumar JS, Physiotherapy for Ankylosing Spondylitis: Systematic Review and a Proposed Rehabilitation Protocol. Curr Rheumatol Rev. 2017;13(2);121-125.

11. Dubinina TV, Podryadnova MV, Krasnenko SO, Erdes ShF. Th erapeutic exercise for patients with ankylosing spondylitis: recommendations and reality. Rheumatology Science and Practice. 2014;52(2):187- 191. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.14412/1995-4484-2014-187-191

12. Gyurcsik ZN, András A, Bodnár N, Szekanecz Z, Szántó S. Improvement in pain intensity, spine stiff ness, and mobility during a controlled individualized physiotherapy program in ankylosing spondylitis. Rheumatology International volume. 2012;32:3931-3936.

13. Brophy S, Cooksey R, Davies H. Th e eff ect of physical activity and motivation on function in ankylosing spondylitis: A cohort study. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2013;42(6):619-626.

14. Passalent LA, Soever LJ, O’Shea FD, Inman RD. Exercise in ankylosing spondylitis: discrepancies between recommendations and reality. J Rheumatology. 2010;37(4):835-841.

15. Godzenko AA, Korsakova YL, Badokin VV. Methods for the evaluation of infl ammatory activity and therapy effi ciency in spondyloarthritis. Modern Rheumatology Journal. 2012;6(2):66-76. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.14412/1996-7012-2012-730.

16. Dubinina TV, Gaydukova IZ, Godzenko AA. Guidelines for the assessment of disease activity and functional status in patients with ankylosing spondylitis in clinical practice. Rheumatology Science and Practice. 2017;55(4):344-350. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.14412/1995-4484-2017-344-350.

17. Schoels MM, Braun J, Dougados M, Emery P, Fitzgerald O et al. Treating axial and peripheral spondyloarthritis, including psoriatic arthritis, to target: results of a systematic literature search to support an international treat-to-target recommendation in spondyloarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014;73(1):238-42. DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-203860.

18. Gunay SM, Keser I, Bicer ZT. Th e eff ects of balance and postural stability exercises on spa based rehabilitation programme in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2018;31(2);337-346.


Review

For citations:


Vysogortseva O.N., Usmankhodzhaeva A.A., Mavlyanova Z.F. NUGA-BEST in the complex of rehabilitation program in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Sports medicine: research and practice. 2020;10(1):13-20. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17238/ISSN2223-2524.2020.1.13

Views: 812


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2223-2524 (Print)
ISSN 2587-9014 (Online)